Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Free Update With 100% Exam Passing Guarantee [2025]
[Oct-2025] Verified Salesforce Exam Dumps with Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam Study Guide
NEW QUESTION # 22
A banking company uses a VIP Flag in the Contact Object that they want only Private Banking Reps to see.
Which approach is recommended to meet this requirement?
- A. Set the Field Level Security for the VIP Flag field so that it is visible to Private Banking Rep Profile.
- B. Define a page layout for Contact Object and add the VIP Flag field for that layout. Remove the VIP Flag field from other layouts.
- C. Change the type of VIP Flag field to a picklist, define a new record type for the Contact Object and make the picklist field available for Editing.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Field-Level Security (FLS) is the most secure and efficient method to restrict visibility of sensitive fields like the VIP Flag to specific user groups or profiles. FLS is applied at the field level, ensuring that users who lack permission cannot view, edit, or access the field, regardless of the sharing or page layout configurations.
* Option A: Changing the field type to a picklist and using record types unnecessarily complicates the solution. Record types are typically used for different business processes, not for field-level security.
* Option B: Using page layouts restricts visibility on the UI but doesn't secure the field from API or report-level access. Users with access to the object could still retrieve the field's data.
* Option C: Setting FLS ensures that the field is hidden everywhere it appears (e.g., UI, reports, APIs) for all profiles except the Private Banking Rep Profile. This is the most effective and Salesforce- recommended method for sensitive data control.
References:
* Field-Level Security Overview
* Best Practices for Securing Sensitive Data
NEW QUESTION # 23
The architect has a requirement to create a criteria-based sharing rule based on the customer Social.. up the rule in Contact Sharing, the field is not shown on the list of available field.
What might cause this?
- A. fields with validation rules are not available for sharing rules.
- B. The field has been configured for encryption.
- C. The architect's profile does not have field level Security (FLS) for this field.
- D. The architect does not have permission to Compliance fields.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 24
Sales operations at Universal Containers (UC) has created Public Reports and Dashboards folders for sales managers. Sales operations and sales managers report to the VP of Sales. Sales operations currently spends a few hours each month updating users that should have access to edit reports and dashboards in these folders.
How should UC grant access to sales managers to automate access to these Public Reports and Dashboards folders?
- A. Share the folders with a "Sales Managers" Public Group.
- B. Share the folders with the lowest roles in the Role Hierarchy; superiors will get access automatically.
- C. Share the folders with the Sales Managers profile.
Answer: A
Explanation:
To efficiently manage access to public report and dashboard folders for a group of users (like sales managers), using a Public Group is the best practice. Public Groups can be used to define access centrally and avoid manual updates.
* Option A: Sharing via the Role Hierarchy provides hierarchical access but does not allow specific access control for folders.
* Option B: Sharing folders with a profile is not supported in Salesforce.
* Option C (Correct): Sharing folders with a Public Group ensures efficient and automated access management for sales managers.
:
Report and Dashboard Folder Sharing
NEW QUESTION # 25
Universal Containers (UC) delivers training in 500 different regions. The UC Operations Users team manage course setup, scheduling, and trainer setup. The Operations Users team members work at a regional level and report to an Operations manager. The Operations manager requested access to edit ALL scheduled courses owned by the Operation Users team.
How can this be achieved?
- A. The Operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses by granting the Operations manager modify ALL on scheduled courses.
- B. The Operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses by creating an ownership-based sharing rule and share the scheduled courses with the Operations manager.
- C. The Operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses owned by the Operations Users team defined in the role hierarchy.
- D. The Operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses by creating a public group and add the Operations manager and the Operations Users team to the public group
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
Role hierarchy is a way to grant access to records based on the user's position in the organization. Users higher in the role hierarchy can access and edit records owned by users lower in the role hierarchy, unless the Grant Access Using Hierarchies option is disabled for a specific object. In this case, the Operations manager can access and edit all scheduled courses owned by the Operations Users team members who report to them in the role hierarchy. Therefore, the answer B is correct and the other options are incorrect
NEW QUESTION # 26
Universal Containers (UC) has a private Organization-Wide Defaults (OWD) model for the Account object and needs to control the access of records and fields according to these requirements:
* Sales reps can view/edit only their own records and cannot access the field "segment" in account page.
* Service reps need to view all accounts but cannot edit any information.
* Sales managers can modify any account of reps reporting to them.
* Service managers can modify any account.
How can a Salesforce architect provide an optimal solution for this scenario?
- A. Use profiles, permission sets, role hierarchy, and field-level security.
- B. Use profiles, manual sharing, and field-level security.
- C. Use profiles, sharing rules, and change OWD to public read-only.
- D. Use profiles, permission sets, and field-level security.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
Profiles and Permission Sets can be used to control the object-level and field-level access for different types of users. For example, sales reps can have read/write access to Account object but not to the segment field, while service reps can have read-only access to Account object and all fields. Role Hierarchy can be used to control the record-level access for users based on their position in the organization. For example, sales managers can access and modify any account of reps reporting to them, while service managers can access and modify any account regardless of ownership. Field-Level Security can be used to override the profiles and permission sets for specific fields on specific records. For example, service managers can edit the segment field on any account, even if their profile does not allow it. Therefore, the answer D is correct and the other options are incorrect3
NEW QUESTION # 27
In order to comply with regulatory requirements, Universal Health must encrypt all Personally Identifiable Information (PII), both while it is being transmitted over the network and while it is at rest. Universal Health has completed a data audit and has determined that 12 fields on the contact record can contain PII, including the contact's name and several other standard fields. Universal Health would like the fields to remain accessible in Salesforce. Which two options does Universal Health have to maintain compliance?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. Enable Salesforce Platform Encryption and select the 12 contact fields to be encrypted.
- B. Use an external, third-party encryption service to encrypt PII before it enters Salesforce.
- C. Implement a custom Apex trigger to automatically encrypt the PII data using the Apex Crypto Class.
- D. Update the field type of each of the 12 fields to "Text (Encrypted)" so that they are encrypted at rest.
Answer: A,D
Explanation:
Explanation
Two options that Universal Health has to maintain compliance are updating the field type of each of the 12 fields to "Text (Encrypted)" so that they are encrypted at rest, and enabling Salesforce Platform Encryption and selecting the 12 contact fields to be encrypted. Both options allow Universal Health to encrypt PII data while it is at rest in Salesforce, and keep the fields accessible in Salesforce. The difference is that text (encrypted) fields have some limitations, such as not being searchable, filterable, or reportable, while platform encryption fields have fewer limitations but require additional licenses and setup
NEW QUESTION # 28
Which functionality does the system method "runAs()" verify when writing test methods?
- A. Enforcement of s user's record sharing
- B. Enforcement of a user's Field Level Security
- C. Enforcement of a user's permissions
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 29
What should an architect recommend to make sure that users that gained access to a custom object record through Apex managed sharing do not lose access to it when its owner is changed?
- A. Create a new record in _Share object with RowCause "Manual".
- B. Use "With Sharing" keyword to make sure record visibility will be considered.
- C. Create a specific Apex Sharing Reason for the custom object.
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 30
How would you make sure Visualforce page is security proof? Choose 3 answers
- A. Use web application tool for security
- B. Manually check for sql injection
- C. Manually check for cross site
- D. Submit to force security scanner
- E. Use debug to check hijacked requests
Answer: A,D,E
NEW QUESTION # 31
When writing test methods, what functionality is verified by the system method"runAs()"?
- A. Enforcement of a user's record sharing.
- B. Enforcement of a user's field-level security.
- C. Enforcement of user permissions.
- D. Enforcement of user's public group assignments.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 32
Universal Containers is planning to pilot a new application to a small set of Sales Reps.
What is the optimal way to grant inly this Sales Reps access to the new functionality, while hiding ..
- A. Create new user records for the pilot user that they will use for the pilot.
- B. Create a permission set to grant access to the new functionality and hide the old functionality.
- C. Clone the Sales Rep profile, adjust settings, and assign the pilot users the new profile.
- D. Revoke access to legacy function in the Sales Rep profile and create a permission set for the ..
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
Cloning the Sales Rep profile, adjusting settings, and assigning the pilot users the new profile is the optimal way to grant only this Sales Reps access to the new functionality, while hiding it from other users. This way, the pilot users can have different permissions and access than the other Sales Reps who are not part of the pilot. Option B is incorrect, since revoking access to legacy function in the Sales Rep profile and creating a permission set for the new functionality would affect all Sales Reps, not just the pilot users. Option C is incorrect, since creating a permission set to grant access to the new functionality and hide the old functionality would not work, as permission sets cannot revoke access. Option D is incorrect, since creating new user records for the pilot user that they will use for the pilot would be unnecessary and inefficient.
NEW QUESTION # 33
Universal Containers would like to customize the security and sharing features of Salesforce Account Teams.
They have decided to implement a Custom Account Team object. They would like the new enhancement to include all of the features of the existing account team, but also utilize Apex and Visualforce on the custom Account Team object.
Which two different approaches should the Architect consider when designing this enhancement?
Choose 2 answers
- A. The need to dynamically create Criteria-Based Sharing rules with Custom Account Team object data.
- B. The need to synchronize the AccountTeamMember object with the Custom Account Team object data.
- C. The need to maintain the Account_share object based upon the Custom Account Team object data.
- D. The need to customize Account screens in Visualforce, as the Account_share object cannot be maintained programmatically.
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
Explanation
The two different approaches that the architect should consider when designing this enhancement are A and B.
Option A ensures that the custom account team object data is consistent with the standard account team member object data, which is used for implicit sharing. Option B ensures that the account share object, which stores the sharing records for accounts, is updated based on the custom account team object data. The other options are either not necessary or not possible.
NEW QUESTION # 34
UniversalContainers(UC)servicerepsareassignedtoaprofilewhichhas"ViewAll"inCase object(Private OWD).To make sure service repshaveaccess toallrelevant information to attendtocustomerrequests, whichtwodetailsshouldasalesforceArchitectsconsider? Choose 2answers:
- A. Service reps willnotbeable toaccessallthe UCAccountsrecordsbecause Account OWD is private.
- B. Servicerepswillbeable toaccessall the UC Accountrecordsdue to Implicit Sharing.
- C. Service reps will notbe able to access all UC contactrecords if theyare controlled by parent.
- D. Service repswill be able to access all UC contactrecords if theyare controlled by parent.
Answer: A,C
NEW QUESTION # 35
A custom Invoice object has been created with a master-detail relationship to Account. The accounts receivable (AR) team needs access to invoice records. AR users neither own nor have access to account records. The Account organization-wide default is set to Private. The AR team is unable to find invoices in list views, reports, and Global Search. The architect has been asked to help troubleshoot.
What is preventing AR team members from seeing invoices?
- A. The AR profile does not have Read permission to the Invoice object.
- B. A sharing rule is missing to share accounts with the AR team.
- C. A sharing rule is missing to share invoices with the AR team.
Answer: B
Explanation:
* Master-Detail Relationship Behavior:
* In a master-detail relationship, access to child records (Invoice) is determined by access to the parent record (Account).
* Since the AR team does not have access to accounts, they cannot see invoices related to those accounts.
* Why Option B is Correct:
* To resolve this issue, a sharing rule must be created to share accounts with the AR team. This will cascade access to the related Invoice records due to the master-detail relationship.
* Why Others Are Incorrect:
* Option A: The AR team has object-level access to Invoice but still cannot see the records due to account-level sharing restrictions.
* Option C: Sharing rules for invoices are not applicable because access to invoices is governed by account-level access in a master-detail relationship.
For detailed information, refer to Salesforce Sharing and Object Relationships documentation: https://help.
salesforce.com/
NEW QUESTION # 36
Universal Containers (UC) delivers training in 500 different regions. The UC operations users team manages course setup, scheduling, and trainer setup. The team members work at a regional level and report to an operations manager. The operations manager requested access to edit ALL scheduled courses owned by the operation users team.
How should this be achieved?
- A. The operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses by creating an ownership-based sharing rule and share the scheduled courses with the operations manager.
- B. The operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses by creating a public group, and add the operations manager and the operations users team to the public group.
- C. The operations manager will get access to the scheduled courses owned by the operations users team defined in the Role Hierarchy.
Answer: C
Explanation:
In Salesforce, the Role Hierarchy grants record access to users higher in the hierarchy. If the operations users are below the operations manager in the Role Hierarchy and the object's organization-wide default (OWD) is not "Private," the manager will inherit access to records owned by their subordinates. This approach is automatic and does not require additional sharing rules or groups.
* Option A: Ownership-based sharing rules are unnecessary if the Role Hierarchy provides the required access.
* Option C: Using a Public Group is an unnecessary workaround for this scenario when Role Hierarchy fulfills the requirement.
:
Role Hierarchy Overview
NEW QUESTION # 37
Universal Containers has recently activated an integration that synchronizes customer information and orders into their CRM of choice: Salesforce.com. One of their largest customers, United Air, has over 12,000 unique contacts. Since the integration was activated, sales reps are having trouble adding contacts to the United Air account. When a sales rep adds a contact, they get the following error message: UNABLE_TO_LOCK_ROW, this issue seems to affect the United Air account and several other large customers. The sales rep can usually save the contact by trying again later in the evening. What should the Architect recommend as a possible solution?
- A. Remove sharing rules and replace them with Apex sharing for Unite Air and the other large accounts.
- B. Add a role-based sharing rule so all sales team members have Read/Write access to contacts.
- C. Implement an account hierarchy and redistribute the contacts evenly under the child accounts.
- D. Create a permission set for the sales team to grant them Read/Write access to all account fields.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
Implementing an account hierarchy and redistributing the contacts evenly under the child accounts is a possible solution to avoid locking errors. This way, the contacts are not associated with a single parent account, and the integration can insert or update them without conflicting with other transactions. The other options do not address the root cause of the locking errors, which is the high number of child records under one parent record.
NEW QUESTION # 38
Universal Containers (UC) implemented Sales Cloud and requested that only certain branch staff trained to sell high risk products can create opportunities for high risk products.
In which two ways can an Architect allow only specific branch staff to sell high risk products?
Choose 2 answers
- A. Share (High Risk) price book with the trained staff via sharing rule.
- B. Configure Price book Organization wide default to No Access.
- C. Share (High Risk) price book with the trained staff via manual sharing.
- D. Set Price Book Organization Wide Default to View Only and share the price book (High Risk) with the trained staff.
Answer: C,D
NEW QUESTION # 39
A custom invoice object has been created with a master-detail relationship to account. The Account Receivable (AR)team needs access to Invoices AR users do not own or have access to Account records.
Account OWD is set to Private. The AR team is unable to find Invoices in List views, Reports, nor in Global Search. The Architect has been asked to help troubleshoot. What could be the issue preventing AR team members from seeing invoices?
- A. A sharing rule is missing to share Invoices to the AR team.
- B. A sharing rule is missing to share Accounts to the AR team.
- C. The AR team profile needs to be assigned an Invoice Page layout.
- D. The Accounts receivable profile does not have read Permission to the Invoice Object.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
A sharing rule is missing to share Accounts to the AR team, which could be the issue preventing AR team members from seeing invoices. Since invoice is a custom object with a master-detail relationship to account, its sharing settings are controlled by its parent account. If AR users do not have access to account records, they will not be able to see or query invoice records either. Option A is incorrect, since a sharing rule to share invoices to the AR team would not work, as invoice inherits its sharing settings from account. Option B is incorrect, since assigning an invoice page layout to the AR team profile would not affect their visibility of invoice records. Option D is incorrect, since giving read permission to the invoice object to the Accounts receivable profile would not grant access to invoice records that are owned by other users.
NEW QUESTION # 40
After testing and deploying a new trigger that does creates a related order when a opportunity is closed, the Architect begins complaints of permission error messages appearing when closing an opportunity.
How did this error occur?
- A. The trigger handler class is using ''with sharing'' and the user does not have access to the orders related to the opportunity.
- B. The trigger should be using RunAs() when creating the order.
- C. The trigger handlers class does not use any sharing keywords and the user not have access to the orders related to the opportunity.
- D. Trigger is using IsCreateable() Apex method and the user doesn't have create permission on the Oder object.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 41
Universal Containers is implementing Sales Cloud. During the final quarter of the financial year, sales managers help each other close deals. They requested a solution in Salesforce to allow them to share opportunities with other sales managers from different teams as needed. They also requested that sharing deals should expire automatically 2 weeks after the new fiscal year starts.
Which proposed solution meets the requirements?
- A. Sharing rules to share opportunities with sales managers
- B. Scheduled Apex job to remove access
- C. Apex sharing to share opportunities with sales managers
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
To meet the requirement of sharing opportunities for collaboration and automatically expiring access, the following approach is best:
* Apex Sharing (Answer A): Apex sharing allows sales managers to share opportunities with specific users. This is essential for ad-hoc and granular sharing that isn't feasible with criteria-based or owner- based sharing rules.
* Scheduled Apex Job (Answer B): Use a scheduled Apex job to remove sharing entries after a specific date, ensuring access expires two weeks after the new fiscal year begins. This provides automation and aligns with the requirement for access expiration.
Option C: Sharing rules cannot handle time-based expiration, making them unsuitable for this use case.
References:
* Apex Managed Sharing Overview
* Scheduled Apex
NEW QUESTION # 42
Universal Containers (UC) has a custom Apex class that enforces a business process and updates opportunity field-level security permissions of read only certain user's profiles are being updated by their class.
How should the architect fix this problem?
- A. Put the code in an class that uses the With Sharing keyword.
- B. Use the IsUpdateable() Apex method to test each field prior to allowing updates.
- C. Add with Sharing keyword to the class.
- D. Use the with SECURYT_ENFORCED keyword in the SOQL statement.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 43
A sales rep at Universal Containers was added to an opportunity team with Read/Write permissions.
Which action is she allowed to perform in the opportunity?
- A. Add/remove members in the opportunity team.
- B. Update opportunity stage.
- C. Replace opportunity owner.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 44
Universal Containers (UC) is implementing Sales Cloud. During the last quarter of the financial of the financial year, they requested a solution in Salesforce to allow them to specify an assistance agent on the opportunity. the assistance fields. The system should automatically remove access from the previous assistant and ..
What is the optimum solution to meet the requirements?
- A. Use opportunity team and create an assistant field, use apex to share opportunities with the assistant
- B. Use apex sharing to share and unicast opportunities with the assistant agent.
- C. Use share group to share opportunities with the assistant agent.
- D. Use sharing rule to share opportunities with the assistant agent.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
Using opportunity team and creating an assistant field, using Apex to share opportunities with the assistant agent is the optimum solution to meet the requirements. Opportunity teams are groups of users who work together on sales opportunities. By creating an assistant field on the opportunity object, the sales reps can specify an assistant agent who can help them with their deals. By using Apex, the system can automatically share the opportunity with the assistant agent based on the value of the assistant field, and remove access from the previous assistant if the field value changes. Option A is incorrect, since using share group to share opportunities with the assistant agent would require manual configuration and maintenance. Option C is incorrect, since using sharing rule to share opportunities with the assistant agent would not allow dynamic sharing based on the assistant field value. Option D is incorrect, since using Apex sharing to share and unshare opportunities with the assistant agent would be similar to option B, but without using opportunity teams.
NEW QUESTION # 45
......
Authentic Best resources for Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Online Practice Exam: https://skillmeup.examprepaway.com/Salesforce/braindumps.Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect.ete.file.html